The Glenn
Highway, Gambell Street to McCarrey Street, Reconstruction Project
is the result of a systematic planning process that has occurred
over the last 20 years. Since the early 1980s, the Anchorage
Metropolitan Area Transportation Study (AMATS), a federally mandated
state-municipal transportation planning effort for the Anchorage
Bowl, and the Municipality of Anchorage (MOA) have generated
a number of ideas and planning decisions that have shaped transportation
needs and guided solutions for the Glenn Highway corridor. Three
conclusions drawn from a review of these documents have guided
the transportation planning for the Glenn Highway corridor:
- Planning documents
adopted by elected officials have identified the Glenn Highway
corridor as an important transportation route within the
MOA and the state.
- Municipal planning
documents implemented since 1982 have identified a need to
improve the Glenn Highway corridor to alleviate congestion.
- Improvements to this
corridor have been planned to involve the Glenn Highway between
Gambell Street to approximately McCarrey Street.
First,
the importance of the Glenn Highway corridor is noted across
many municipal and state planning documents. As part of the
National Highway System, the Glenn Highway and the 5th and
6th Avenue couplet are responsible for providing
for the long-range movement of people, goods, and services,
as noted in the 1997 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP).
Moreover, according to the 1982 Anchorage Bowl Comprehensive
Plan, the Glenn Highway is one of three major transportation
corridors with the MOA, and the primary corridor for east-west
vehicle movement into and out of Anchorage. Its role
is also noted in "Anchorage 2020," the most recent
version of the Anchorage Bowl Comprehensive Plan, as promoting
highway/through-town efficiency. A number of planning
documents put forth a long-term vision for the Glenn Highway
to carry the majority of the vehicle traffic. Some plans (such
as the 1982 Anchorage Bowl Comprehensive Plan and the 1984
and 1991 LRTPs) identify the Seward and Glenn Highways as a
connected freeway system to accommodate this need, while other
documents (such as the 1997 LRTP) envision an expanded Glenn
Highway using existing rights-of-way. No matter the configuration
of lanes or the exact alignment, the history of these planning
decisions indicates that the Glenn Highway is the corridor
on which higher-speed vehicle travel into and out of the city
is to occur (instead of parallel routes such as 15th Avenue-Debarr
Road or Northern Lights Boulevard).Second,
municipal planning documents implemented since 1982, as well
as data gathering and modeling efforts undertaken in support
of those documents, have identified a need to improve the Glenn
Highway corridor to alleviate congestion. The following transportation
planning documents all identity congestion as a problem in
the Glenn Highway corridor.
- The 1982 "Major
Corridors Study" (performed by DKS Associates for AMATS)
analyzes Anchorages major corridors and recommends
improvements needed to ensure that those corridors provide
good levels of service to the year 2000. The Glenn Highway
(termed the Northside Corridor in that report) is identified
as needing improvement. The report explores a number of alternatives
and recommends construction of a freeway extension from Bragaw
Street across grade-separated crossings at Commercial Drive
and Mountain View Drive north of East 3rd Avenue
to Ingra/Gambell Streets to meet level of service (LOS) goals.
- According to the MOAs
1984 LRTP, a number of intersections and segments of the
Glenn Highway in the project area were already operating
(in 1983) at LOS D and F during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours.
This plan also recommends Glenn Highway improvements as construction
of a freeway extension from Bragaw Street across grade-separated
crossings at Commercial Drive and Mountain View Drive north
of East 3rd Avenue to Ingra/Gambell Streets.
- In 1991 improvements
in the corridor to alleviate congestion had not been completed,
and analysis conducted as part of the LRTP continued to indicate
improvements were necessary to provide a LOS at least equal
to LOS D. All model runs of various system improvements (for
example with and without Bragaw and Boniface extensions)
completed as part of the plan indicate that improvements
would be needed in the Glenn Highway corridor to bring the
Glenn Highway up to LOS D. Rather than construction of a
freeway in a new alignment, however, the 1991 LRTP recommends
expansion of the Glenn Highway (up to eight lanes) in its
current alignment between Gambell Street and Boniface Parkway.
- In 1994 a review of
the planning factors from the Intermodal Surface Transportation
Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) identified the expansion of
5th Avenue/Glenn Highway up to eight lanes as
a project that could be affected by new requirements for
congestion management.
- In 1997, no improvements
had been made to address the congestion in the corridor.
The 1997 plan still indicates the need for improvements (carrying
forward the 1991 LRTPs recommendations for the Glenn
Highway) and identifies worsening congestion.
Third,
as alternatives for dealing with the congestion problems in
the Glenn Highway corridor have been explored, a number of
planning decisions have been made regarding those alternatives.
These decisions have taken some options off the table and have
focused efforts on the Glenn Highway corridor between Gambell
Street to approximately McCarrey Street. These planning decisions,
adopted by elected officials, are highlighted below. The
15th Avenue Bypass (a road from the Glenn Highway
through the corner of the Northway Mall, over Airport Heights
Drive, around Merrill Field to connect to 15th Avenue
and eventually to the Seward Highway) was
first proposed in 1982 in DKS Associates "Major Corridors Study." This
idea was not carried forward in the 1984
LRTP, and both the 1991 and 1997 LRTPs
explicitly reject connecting the Glenn
Highway and Seward Highway via the 15th Avenue
Bypass. Instead the 1991 and 1997 LRTPs recommend improvements
within the Glenn Highway corridor. Subsequently, the MOA
has begun upgrading 15th Avenue
to reduce speeds and add enhancements,
and the draft comprehensive plan, "Anchorage
2020" designates 15th Avenue as a transit
corridor. The conclusion of the history of these planning
decisions is that the 15th Avenue
Bypass is not a solution available to this
project.
Another
important consideration are decisions
regarding a Glenn Highway-Seward Highway freeway connection.
The 1984 LRTP recommends a freeway standard
throughout the Seward and Glenn Highways,
and proposes to connect these two facilities in
a new alignment north of 3rd Avenue.
However, while the 1991 and 1997 LRTPs
explicitly call for a freeway standard
on the Seward Highway between 36th Avenue
and 20th Avenue,
they do not recommend that this freeway
standard continue north to intersect
with a Glenn Highway freeway in a new
alignment north of 3rd Avenue.
Moreover, while the 1991 LRTP supports
a future Seward Highway-Glenn Highway
freeway connection in an alignment north
of 3rd Avenue
and recommends that it be studied further,
the 1997 LRTP discards this option. The
1997 LRTP does not identify the shift
of the Glenn Highway to a new corridor
north of 3rd Avenue
or the need to connect the two highways.
Instead the 1997 LRTP recommends expansion
of the Glenn Highway in its current alignment
between Gambell Street and Boniface Parkway.
It does recommend, however, that Major
Investment Studies be completed for both
the Seward Highway and Glenn Highway
corridors.
The review of the planning
documents relevant to the Glenn Highway
project provide a historical context
to the a.m. and p.m. peak-hour traffic
congestion problems within the corridor.
The planning documents identify the
Glenn Highway as the planned corridor for handling
the majority of the traffic. These
documents, adopted by elected officials, limit options
for bypassing the bottlenecked area
of the Glenn Highway corridor to the south
of Merrill Field and explicitly call
for expansion within the 5th Avenue-Glenn
Highway corridor as the alternative
to be explored further.
BACK
TO TOP |